🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". The policy could be passed next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to approve a law lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic statement supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is granted. While it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a solid starting point," said a leading MEP behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, support gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and age appropriate for minors," said a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various figures to mimic this path, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, additional countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

Even as this worldwide debate continues, the policies of Australia and others indicate that states globally are increasingly prepared to delay for the industry to self-regulate.